TLCTC Blog - 2025/04/07

Enhancing STIX with the TLCTC Framework (Using Standardized TLCTC-XX.YY Enumeration)

The Challenge

The cybersecurity landscape faces a critical challenge: fragmented threat intelligence that fails to effectively connect strategic risk management with operational security execution. While frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK and STIX enable detailed threat intelligence sharing, they lack a standardized high-level threat categorization system that aligns threat intelligence with risk management and security operations.

Framework Benefits

The 10 Top Level Cyber Threat Clusters (TLCTC) framework, utilizing the TLCTC-XX.YY standardized enumeration, addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive solution that bridges threat intelligence with practical security implementation.

  • Universal Taxonomy: Establishes a standardized system (TLCTC-XX.YY) for consistent threat intelligence collection and sharing across organizations and sectors. The `.00` suffix denotes the top-level cluster, allowing for future refinement (e.g., TLCTC-08.01 for Direct Physical Access).
  • Intelligence-Vulnerability Mapping: Creates clear connections between threat intelligence indicators and generic vulnerabilities, enabling more effective risk assessment.
  • Control Implementation Methodology: Provides a structured approach for translating threat intelligence into specific control requirements and implementation guidelines.
  • Unified Communication: Establishes a common language using standardized identifiers between threat intelligence teams, risk managers, and security operations personnel.

Integration Benefits

By integrating this framework with established standards like MITRE ATT&CK and STIX, organizations can transform raw threat intelligence into actionable insights that drive both strategic risk decisions and tactical security operations. This integration enables:

  • Enhanced Threat Hunting: More effective identification and tracking of potential threats across the environment using consistent identifiers.
  • Precise Control Selection: Better alignment between identified threats (e.g., TLCTC-07.00) and necessary security controls.
  • Comprehensive Incident Response: More thorough and effective incident response planning and execution based on clear attack sequence understanding (e.g., #09 -> #03 -> #07).
  • Lifecycle Consistency: Maintained consistency across the entire threat intelligence lifecycle, from collection to action.

Current State of STIX

STIX Component Purpose Limitation Addressed by TLCTC Integration
Objects (e.g., Threat Actor, Attack Pattern, Malware) Describe individual elements of cyber threats Provides a standardized high-level categorization system (TLCTC-XX.YY) to link these elements.
Relationships Connect different STIX objects to represent complex scenarios Offers a standardized way (Attack Sequence Object using TLCTC IDs) to represent attack sequences/paths.
Intrusion Set Represent adversary behaviors and resources Complements actor focus with threat category focus, enabling better risk mapping.

Proposed STIX Enhancements using TLCTC-XX.YY

Introduce new STIX Custom Objects or enhance existing ones to incorporate TLCTC concepts.

Threat Cluster Custom Object Example

{
  "type": "x-threat-cluster",
  "spec_version": "2.1",
  "id": "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-01.00]", // Standard STIX ID
  "created": "2025-03-29T10:00:00.000Z",
  "modified": "2025-03-29T10:00:00.000Z",
  "name": "Abuse of Functions (TLCTC-01.00)",
  "x_tlctc_id": "TLCTC-01.00", // Standardized TLCTC Identifier
  "description": "Abuse of Functions involves manipulating the intended functionality of software or systems for malicious purposes",
  "x_generic_vulnerability": "The scope, complexity, or inherent trust placed in legitimate software functions, features, and configurations.",
  "x_asset_type": "Software (Its functions and configuration)",
  "x_attacker_perspective": "I abuse a functionality, not a coding issue."
}

Attack Sequence Custom Object Example

{
  "type": "x-attack-sequence",
  "spec_version": "2.1",
  "id": "x-attack-sequence--[UUID-for-SEQ001]", // Standard STIX ID
  "created": "2025-03-29T10:05:00.000Z",
  "modified": "2025-03-29T10:05:00.000Z",
  "name": "Phishing to Malware Chain (SEQ001)",
  "x_sequence_notation": "#09 -> #03 -> #07", // Human-readable sequence
  "initial_cluster_ref": "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-09.00]", // Ref to STIX object
  "x_initial_cluster_tlctc_id": "TLCTC-09.00", // Corresponding TLCTC ID
  "subsequent_cluster_refs": [
    "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-03.00]", // Ref to STIX object
    "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]"  // Ref to STIX object
  ],
  "x_subsequent_clusters_tlctc_ids": [
     "TLCTC-03.00",
     "TLCTC-07.00"
  ],
  "observed_frequency": "high",
  "first_observed": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
  "last_observed": "2025-03-28T00:00:00Z",
  "x_description": "Common attack path starting with social engineering leading to client exploitation and malware deployment."
}

Enhanced Attack Pattern Object (STIX Standard Object with Custom Extension)

{
  "type": "attack-pattern",
  "spec_version": "2.1",
  "id": "attack-pattern--[UUID-for-Spearphishing]", // Standard STIX ID
  "created": "2025-03-29T10:10:00.000Z",
  "modified": "2025-03-29T10:10:00.000Z",
  "name": "Spearphishing Attachment",
  "description": "Adversaries may send spearphishing emails with malicious attachments, often leading to client exploitation or malware execution.",
  "kill_chain_phases": [{
    "kill_chain_name": "mitre-attack", // Or other kill chain models
    "phase_name": "initial-access"
  }],
  "external_references": [ // Link to MITRE ATT&CK Tactic/Technique if applicable
     {"source_name": "mitre-attack", "external_id": "T1566.001", "url": "..."}
  ],
  "x_tlctc_mapping": { // Custom extension for TLCTC context
    "primary_cluster_ref": "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-09.00]",
    "primary_cluster_tlctc_id": "TLCTC-09.00", // Social Engineering
    "typical_followup_cluster_refs": [
      "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-03.00]", // Exploiting Client
      "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]"  // Malware
    ],
    "typical_followup_clusters_tlctc_ids": [
      "TLCTC-03.00",
      "TLCTC-07.00"
    ],
    "typical_sequence_notation": "#09 -> #03 -> #07",
    "attack_phase_relevance": ["Initial Access", "Execution (via user interaction)"]
  }
}

Real-World Implementation Example: Emotet Campaign

Emotet Attack Sequence Object

Sequence Notation: #09 -> #07 -> #07 -> #04 -> (#01 + #07)

{
  "type": "x-attack-sequence",
  "spec_version": "2.1",
  "id": "x-attack-sequence--[UUID-for-Emotet-Example]",
  "created": "2025-03-29T11:00:00.000Z",
  "modified": "2025-03-29T11:00:00.000Z",
  "name": "Emotet Initial Access to Domain Compromise and Ransomware",
  "x_sequence_notation": "#09 -> #07 -> #07 -> #04 -> (#01 + #07)",
  "initial_cluster_ref": "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-09.00]",
  "x_initial_cluster_tlctc_id": "TLCTC-09.00", // Social Engineering
  "subsequent_cluster_refs": [
    "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]", // Malware (Emotet loader)
    "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]", // Malware (Trickbot)
    "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-04.00]", // Identity Theft (Cred stealing)
    // Representing parallel execution requires relationships or a more complex object structure.
    // For simplicity here, we list the involved cluster object refs.
    "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-01.00]", // Abuse of Functions (Lateral via creds)
    "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]"  // Malware (Ryuk Ransomware)
  ],
  "x_subsequent_clusters_tlctc_ids": [ // Reflecting the sequence steps
     "TLCTC-07.00",
     "TLCTC-07.00",
     "TLCTC-04.00",
     ["TLCTC-01.00", "TLCTC-07.00"] // Indicating the parallel step
  ],
  "x_description": "Typical Emotet attack involving phishing, multiple malware stages, credential theft, lateral movement using abused functions, and final ransomware deployment.",
  "observed_frequency": "medium" // Example frequency
}

Note: Representing complex paths, especially parallel execution like `(#01 + #07)`, within a simple sequence object can be challenging. STIX Relationships between the involved Attack Pattern or Malware objects might offer a more robust representation for tooling but less direct human readability for the sequence itself. The custom object approach shown provides a compromise.

Conclusion

Integrating the Top Level Cyber Threat Clusters, with its standardized TLCTC-XX.YY enumeration, into STIX significantly enhances threat intelligence sharing and analysis. It provides a much-needed strategic layer, allowing organizations to model attack sequences more effectively, improve communication across teams, and better align security controls and risk management efforts with the actual threat landscape.