TLCTC Blog - 2025/04/07
Enhancing STIX with the TLCTC Framework (Using Standardized TLCTC-XX.YY Enumeration)
The Challenge
The cybersecurity landscape faces a critical challenge: fragmented threat intelligence that fails to effectively connect strategic risk management with operational security execution. While frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK and STIX enable detailed threat intelligence sharing, they lack a standardized high-level threat categorization system that aligns threat intelligence with risk management and security operations.
Framework Benefits
The 10 Top Level Cyber Threat Clusters (TLCTC) framework, utilizing the TLCTC-XX.YY standardized enumeration, addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive solution that bridges threat intelligence with practical security implementation.
- Universal Taxonomy: Establishes a standardized system (TLCTC-XX.YY) for consistent threat intelligence collection and sharing across organizations and sectors. The `.00` suffix denotes the top-level cluster, allowing for future refinement (e.g., TLCTC-08.01 for Direct Physical Access).
- Intelligence-Vulnerability Mapping: Creates clear connections between threat intelligence indicators and generic vulnerabilities, enabling more effective risk assessment.
- Control Implementation Methodology: Provides a structured approach for translating threat intelligence into specific control requirements and implementation guidelines.
- Unified Communication: Establishes a common language using standardized identifiers between threat intelligence teams, risk managers, and security operations personnel.
Integration Benefits
By integrating this framework with established standards like MITRE ATT&CK and STIX, organizations can transform raw threat intelligence into actionable insights that drive both strategic risk decisions and tactical security operations. This integration enables:
- Enhanced Threat Hunting: More effective identification and tracking of potential threats across the environment using consistent identifiers.
- Precise Control Selection: Better alignment between identified threats (e.g., TLCTC-07.00) and necessary security controls.
- Comprehensive Incident Response: More thorough and effective incident response planning and execution based on clear attack sequence understanding (e.g., #09 -> #03 -> #07).
- Lifecycle Consistency: Maintained consistency across the entire threat intelligence lifecycle, from collection to action.
Current State of STIX
STIX Component | Purpose | Limitation Addressed by TLCTC Integration |
---|---|---|
Objects (e.g., Threat Actor, Attack Pattern, Malware) | Describe individual elements of cyber threats | Provides a standardized high-level categorization system (TLCTC-XX.YY) to link these elements. |
Relationships | Connect different STIX objects to represent complex scenarios | Offers a standardized way (Attack Sequence Object using TLCTC IDs) to represent attack sequences/paths. |
Intrusion Set | Represent adversary behaviors and resources | Complements actor focus with threat category focus, enabling better risk mapping. |
Proposed STIX Enhancements using TLCTC-XX.YY
Introduce new STIX Custom Objects or enhance existing ones to incorporate TLCTC concepts.
Threat Cluster Custom Object Example
{ "type": "x-threat-cluster", "spec_version": "2.1", "id": "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-01.00]", // Standard STIX ID "created": "2025-03-29T10:00:00.000Z", "modified": "2025-03-29T10:00:00.000Z", "name": "Abuse of Functions (TLCTC-01.00)", "x_tlctc_id": "TLCTC-01.00", // Standardized TLCTC Identifier "description": "Abuse of Functions involves manipulating the intended functionality of software or systems for malicious purposes", "x_generic_vulnerability": "The scope, complexity, or inherent trust placed in legitimate software functions, features, and configurations.", "x_asset_type": "Software (Its functions and configuration)", "x_attacker_perspective": "I abuse a functionality, not a coding issue." }
Attack Sequence Custom Object Example
{ "type": "x-attack-sequence", "spec_version": "2.1", "id": "x-attack-sequence--[UUID-for-SEQ001]", // Standard STIX ID "created": "2025-03-29T10:05:00.000Z", "modified": "2025-03-29T10:05:00.000Z", "name": "Phishing to Malware Chain (SEQ001)", "x_sequence_notation": "#09 -> #03 -> #07", // Human-readable sequence "initial_cluster_ref": "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-09.00]", // Ref to STIX object "x_initial_cluster_tlctc_id": "TLCTC-09.00", // Corresponding TLCTC ID "subsequent_cluster_refs": [ "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-03.00]", // Ref to STIX object "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]" // Ref to STIX object ], "x_subsequent_clusters_tlctc_ids": [ "TLCTC-03.00", "TLCTC-07.00" ], "observed_frequency": "high", "first_observed": "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z", "last_observed": "2025-03-28T00:00:00Z", "x_description": "Common attack path starting with social engineering leading to client exploitation and malware deployment." }
Enhanced Attack Pattern Object (STIX Standard Object with Custom Extension)
{ "type": "attack-pattern", "spec_version": "2.1", "id": "attack-pattern--[UUID-for-Spearphishing]", // Standard STIX ID "created": "2025-03-29T10:10:00.000Z", "modified": "2025-03-29T10:10:00.000Z", "name": "Spearphishing Attachment", "description": "Adversaries may send spearphishing emails with malicious attachments, often leading to client exploitation or malware execution.", "kill_chain_phases": [{ "kill_chain_name": "mitre-attack", // Or other kill chain models "phase_name": "initial-access" }], "external_references": [ // Link to MITRE ATT&CK Tactic/Technique if applicable {"source_name": "mitre-attack", "external_id": "T1566.001", "url": "..."} ], "x_tlctc_mapping": { // Custom extension for TLCTC context "primary_cluster_ref": "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-09.00]", "primary_cluster_tlctc_id": "TLCTC-09.00", // Social Engineering "typical_followup_cluster_refs": [ "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-03.00]", // Exploiting Client "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]" // Malware ], "typical_followup_clusters_tlctc_ids": [ "TLCTC-03.00", "TLCTC-07.00" ], "typical_sequence_notation": "#09 -> #03 -> #07", "attack_phase_relevance": ["Initial Access", "Execution (via user interaction)"] } }
Real-World Implementation Example: Emotet Campaign
Emotet Attack Sequence Object
Sequence Notation: #09 -> #07 -> #07 -> #04 -> (#01 + #07)
{ "type": "x-attack-sequence", "spec_version": "2.1", "id": "x-attack-sequence--[UUID-for-Emotet-Example]", "created": "2025-03-29T11:00:00.000Z", "modified": "2025-03-29T11:00:00.000Z", "name": "Emotet Initial Access to Domain Compromise and Ransomware", "x_sequence_notation": "#09 -> #07 -> #07 -> #04 -> (#01 + #07)", "initial_cluster_ref": "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-09.00]", "x_initial_cluster_tlctc_id": "TLCTC-09.00", // Social Engineering "subsequent_cluster_refs": [ "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]", // Malware (Emotet loader) "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]", // Malware (Trickbot) "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-04.00]", // Identity Theft (Cred stealing) // Representing parallel execution requires relationships or a more complex object structure. // For simplicity here, we list the involved cluster object refs. "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-01.00]", // Abuse of Functions (Lateral via creds) "x-threat-cluster--[UUID-for-TLCTC-07.00]" // Malware (Ryuk Ransomware) ], "x_subsequent_clusters_tlctc_ids": [ // Reflecting the sequence steps "TLCTC-07.00", "TLCTC-07.00", "TLCTC-04.00", ["TLCTC-01.00", "TLCTC-07.00"] // Indicating the parallel step ], "x_description": "Typical Emotet attack involving phishing, multiple malware stages, credential theft, lateral movement using abused functions, and final ransomware deployment.", "observed_frequency": "medium" // Example frequency }
Note: Representing complex paths, especially parallel execution like `(#01 + #07)`, within a simple sequence object can be challenging. STIX Relationships between the involved Attack Pattern or Malware objects might offer a more robust representation for tooling but less direct human readability for the sequence itself. The custom object approach shown provides a compromise.
Conclusion
Integrating the Top Level Cyber Threat Clusters, with its standardized TLCTC-XX.YY enumeration, into STIX significantly enhances threat intelligence sharing and analysis. It provides a much-needed strategic layer, allowing organizations to model attack sequences more effectively, improve communication across teams, and better align security controls and risk management efforts with the actual threat landscape.